Re: Query for Brad Guth



Is Google Usenet Groups having another bad archive/server day?

A somewhat better JAXA/Selene HDTV image file that doesn't seem nearly
as doctored as those before, except for the unusual lack of dynamic
range and poor color saturation (especially of the moon surface)
http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hdtv/000/hdtv_000_6_l.jpg
Cranking up the color saturations and of merely replacing the color
black with a 10% lighter version of dark gray is what allows us to see
the radiation belt or sphere of whatever's surrounding Earth, and for
some odd reason makes our physically dark moon look as though
greenish. Too bad we're still not being given any look-see at those
original HDTV color images as is. Apparently of anything JAXA/Selene
is either taboo or having become nondisclosure rated.

BTW, it's interesting how the Google 'search for' or of their 'search
groups' is all screwed up again, such as a 'search groups' for "brad
guth" and then 'sort by date' keeps turning up this old topic of
"Query for Brad Guth", as though it was of the most recent as having
used my name.
.. - Brad Guth


On Jan 31, 5:37 am, BradGuth <bradg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Why should "Query forBrad Guth" keep coming up to the top of the
Google/NOVA Usenet Group search index, especially when before my
having replied into this topic it had been a good month out of date to
begin with?

Is Usenet broken, or just getting manipulated to suit some hidden
agenda?
. -Brad Guth

On Jan 31, 5:28 am, BradGuth <bradg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Interesting how the Google/NOVA Usenet of a given "search for" keeps
getting modified on my behalf. It's as thoughBradGuthor bradguth
is climbing up through the index stack of most interesting or perhaps
most weird status of whatever Usenet has to offer.

On Dec 30 2007, 9:28 am, Matt <MattWri...@xxxxxxx> wrote:

I couldn't resist throwing out this question:

What WOULD you accept as evidence that you are wrong and the Moon is
not only reachable by humans, but has been reached? When NASA
Constellation astronauts make many visits, adding dozens of direct and
thousands of indirect witnesses? Or would that just be evidence of a
bigger conspiracy? What if astronauts from China and Russia add more
of the same evidence? Is there ANY evidence that you would find
convincing?

Similarly, when every probe and astronomical study of Venus is already
lined up on the side of demonstrating it's a hot planet where even
extremophile bacteria would be flash-baked, is there ANY evidence you
would find convincing? More decades of probes descending into the
atmosphere and reporting the same findings?

Like I said, I couldn't resist asking.

Like my having been there and done this a thousand times before, and
as such I have nothing further to add to my interpretation of what our
NASA/Apollo wizards accomplished. Obviously any amount of new and
improved wordings don't count, especially if such incorporates the
regular laws of physics and the best available science that simply
doesn't add up to what we've all been informed by those supposedly
having "the right stuff".

As I've informed others so many times before, that it really doesn't
take a rocket scientist or even an Einstein to have realized from what
a little honestly deductive observation of Venus has been telling us,
that Venus had been and may still be lived upon by something
intelligent enough to have created a substantial tarmac, bridge, tall
and otherwise large area structures in a very community and rational
like community that's perfectly easy enough to interpret from those
Magellan radar obtained images.

By now, fifth graders should have known there's other intelligent life
existing/coexisting on Venus. Even the intelligence of Spongebob
Squarpants would have known there's other life existing/coexisting on
Venus, as well as Barny, Big Bird and Cookie Monster would have to
have known there's other intelligent life on Venus. In fact, all of
our warm and fuzzy Sesame street Muppets, including Kermit the Frog
and Miss Piggy knows about such other life existing/coexisting on
Venus.

The regular laws of physics and best available science knows that
intelligent other life could technically exist/coexist on Venus,
especially since there's all that unlimited and renewable energy to
behold. This doesn't mean that Venus locals are anything like us
humans, even know about us or much less having the necessary
technology for interplanetary explorations, not that any half smart
Venusian or most any other ET in their right mind would not dare set
foot on this wet and badly polluted Earth that has cultivated far more
than our fair share of lethal toxins, microbes and downright nasty
bugs, not to mention our incest mutated species of such weird bigotry
that's continually exterminating its own kind over as little as an
insult, faith-based issues and as of lately over fossil fuel.

Bart and Lisa Simpson would certainly have been smart enough to have
known that other intelligent life could have existed/coexisted on
Venus, and because it's such a no brainer is why even Homer Simpson
knows there's intelligent other life on Venus, as well as being on
record as not believing we've walked on the moon. In fact, you don't
have to be an Einstein to have figured this one out, although having
at least one working eye and half a brain is one of those basic
observationology requirements on behalf of deductively connecting
those radar pixels, or on behalf of connecting whatever dots of
physics and science information.

BTW, does Sesame Street even have a rabbi, a priest or a minister of
any kind? (apparently not so far, as perhaps because that would only
be asking for more trouble than it's worth under most circumstances).
In fact, Sesame Street has no stinking government to pay for, or as
having to deal with their corrupt and often bloody global domination
fiascos. You see, Muppets are not actually stupid or much less
arrogant, greedy and bigoted like most humans in Usenet that have
their pretend names to go along with their pretend-atheism motives and
hidden agendas to flaunt.
. -BradGuth

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Life and Exoplanets (Was: Belief in God is NOT incompatible with science!!)
    ... of vast energy resources greater than Earth (such as Venus). ... sense than having to consider that all life upon Earth is terrestrial ... >They would need to have liquid water on the surface. ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Detecting ETI via CO2
    ... be of life as we know it. ... a nicely pressurized and bone dry CO2 environment isn't all ... Upon Venus is where the vast bulk of their CO2 ... enormous availability of various green/renewable energy via geothermal ...
    (sci.astro.seti)
  • Re: Any research going on for terraforming venus?
    ... Venusian Composite Rigid Airship: ... Venusian atmospheric probe that'll function rather nicely below their ... Unlike most other planets, or even moons that we know of, Venus is just ... life in more viable ways than it's being given credit for. ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Life on Venus is absolute hell, but doable
    ... surface temp of Venus by the USSR probe that landed. ... Here's more than two sentences worth on behalf of accomplishing life on ... and mother Earth is certainly about ... folks efficiently storing that water as h2o2 should hardly have taken ...
    (sci.space.history)
  • Re: Life on Venus is absolute hell, but doable
    ... capable of surviving Venus, at least at full capacity while operating ... Technically even life as we know it, as dumb and dumber and thereby as ... and of a reverse-kiln that's got access to unlimited energy ...
    (sci.space.history)