Re: science.space.tech
- From: BradGuth <bradguth@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 10:09:44 -0800 (PST)
On Mar 2, 5:54 pm, OM <om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 23:05:19 +0000, Dr J R Stockton
<j...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Try asking in sci.space.moderated, which seems to be operating rather
gently.
...Where there's only been one post all year long? Let's start with
the important question: who the *** was supposed to be moderating
.science and .tech, because *BOTH* groups have been dead for almost a
year save for the "Frequently Used Acronyms" posts.
OM
It's just another mainstream status quo joke of a group, that has
moderated itself to death anyway. So what's the difference?
.. - Brad Guth
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: science.space.tech
- From: bjdowling
- Re: science.space.tech
- References:
- science.space.tech
- From: Markus Baur
- Re: science.space.tech
- From: Dr J R Stockton
- Re: science.space.tech
- From: OM
- science.space.tech
- Prev by Date: Re: FWD: Secret museum on the moon's surface?
- Next by Date: Re: Hillary Clinton - Your Pro-Space Candidate!?
- Previous by thread: Re: science.space.tech
- Next by thread: Re: science.space.tech
- Index(es):
Loading