Re: science.space.tech

On Mar 3, 7:41 pm, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)"
<mooregr_deletet...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"bjdowling" <bjmos...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:9a75235a-1b0f-4807-98c7-a1e6b67f2b8e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Mar 3, 1:09 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:





On Mar 2, 5:54 pm, OM <om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 23:05:19 +0000, Dr J R Stockton

<j...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Try asking in sci.space.moderated, which seems to be operating rather
gently.

...Where there's only been one post all year long? Let's start with
the important question: who the *** was supposed to be moderating
.science and .tech, because *BOTH* groups have been dead for almost a
year save for the "Frequently Used Acronyms" posts.

OM

It's just another mainstream status quo joke of a group, that has
moderated itself to death anyway. So what's the difference?
. - Brad Guth

What is the reason for the silence on space tech? bj

The moderator has basically given up.

--
Greg Moore
SQL Server DBA Consulting           Remote and Onsite available!
Email: sql  (at)  greenms.com          http://www.greenms.com/sqlserver.html- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Why? bj
.

Quantcast