Re: science.space.tech
- From: BradGuth <bradguth@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 15:14:34 -0800 (PST)
This Google/NOVA Usenet of this mostly anti-think-tank from naysay
hell on Earth, as such works best with a bit fewer words and otherwise
links to external pages, such as your www.alaskpublishing.com
Otherwise try to somewhat focus upon the intent of the given original
topic, as for otherwise it's bad enough to follow whatever's getting
said.
Start an entirely fresh topic with just your wordy entro-page, and
then try not responding to those going off-topic, seems to work the
best, especially without ever having the "read more" at the end of the
first page.
.. - Brad Guth
.
- References:
- science.space.tech
- From: Markus Baur
- Re: science.space.tech
- From: Alan Erskine
- Re: science.space.tech
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: science.space.tech
- From: Alan Erskine
- Re: science.space.tech
- From: Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)
- Re: science.space.tech
- From: Markus Baur
- Re: science.space.tech
- From: BradGuth
- Re: science.space.tech
- From: Hank Kroll
- science.space.tech
- Prev by Date: Re: science.space.tech
- Next by Date: Re: science.space.tech
- Previous by thread: Re: science.space.tech
- Next by thread: Re: science.space.tech
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|