Re: A-9 landing procedure
- From: "scottlowther@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <scottlowther@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:54:37 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 26, 5:09 pm, Pat Flannery <flan...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It's somewhat surprising they didn't think about putting a pilot in it,
as that would solve a lot of guidance problems
A: Not necessarily. What condition will the pilot be in at that point
in the flight? What level of control will he really have?
B: Adding a pilot means deleting a warhead. Lobbing an ICBM across the
Atlantic packing one ton of high explosive is lame-ass enough, but
lobbing an *empty* ICBM across the ocean would be damn near a joke.
Anyway, the piloted V-2 ICBM story goes back at least as far as 1947:http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/12/20/transatlantic-roller-coaste...
"Amazing Semi-Factual Tales of Super-Science." Those magazines at the
time were good for learning how to make a table or for an hours
entertaining reading, but as historical documents... not so much.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A-9 landing procedure
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: A-9 landing procedure
- From: mholt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: A-9 landing procedure
- References:
- A-9 landing procedure
- From: mholt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: A-9 landing procedure
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: A-9 landing procedure
- From: Monte Davis
- Re: A-9 landing procedure
- From: Pat Flannery
- A-9 landing procedure
- Prev by Date: Re: Strange Maps
- Next by Date: Re: How much mass was saved by using a two-stage LM in Apollo?
- Previous by thread: Re: A-9 landing procedure
- Next by thread: Re: A-9 landing procedure
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|