Re: Lynx Spaceplane
- From: Eric Chomko <pne.chomko@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 18:46:11 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 27, 5:40 pm, fairwa...@xxxxxxxxx (Derek Lyons) wrote:
Pat Flannery <flan...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Eric Chomko wrote:
Also that is why they use the shuttle (of which eyeball hates) to fix
the Hubble Space Telescope in space. They do NOT bring HST back to
Earth to fix as he implied with his (dumb) post.
The original intention was to return it to Earth one or more times for
equipment upgrades and general maintenance, but it ended up being to
heavy for the Shuttle to safely land with it.
The problem with theory is it's launched on the Shuttle, it's by
defintion light enough for the Shuttle to land with it. (RTLS, TAL,
AOA, some ATO scenarios...)
Though a few (IIRC including Chandra but not Hubble) were in the 'only
try this once, then inspect the hell out of Shuttle and consider
retiring it' range.
When LDEF was brought back down after it was done, for inspection, was
it damaged by the shuttle upon return?
Eric
D.
--
Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh.
http://derekl1963.livejournal.com/
-Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings.
Oct 5th, 2004 JDL
.
- References:
- Lynx Spaceplane
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: Lynx Spaceplane
- From: eyeball
- Re: Lynx Spaceplane
- From: William R. Frensley
- Re: Lynx Spaceplane
- From: Eric Chomko
- Re: Lynx Spaceplane
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: Lynx Spaceplane
- From: Derek Lyons
- Lynx Spaceplane
- Prev by Date: Re: Lynx Spaceplane
- Next by Date: Re: Lynx Spaceplane
- Previous by thread: Re: Lynx Spaceplane
- Next by thread: Re: Lynx Spaceplane
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|