Re: Lynx Spaceplane
- From: Dave Michelson <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 05:50:20 GMT
Pat Flannery wrote:
Brian Thorn wrote:
There was also the desire to keep Hubble working as much as possible.
It can't do that on the ground waiting for a Shuttle relaunch a year
later (and hoping the schedule holds). With on-orbit servicing, Hubble
is back at work a month later at most.
I've emailed NASA's Hubble website to find out the main reason why the return option was ditched.
Gee, Pat. Don't you believe anything that well-informed (and
well-intentioned) colleagues pass on to you? ;-)
--
Dave Michelson
davem@xxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Lynx Spaceplane
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: Lynx Spaceplane
- References:
- Lynx Spaceplane
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: Lynx Spaceplane
- From: eyeball
- Re: Lynx Spaceplane
- From: William R. Frensley
- Re: Lynx Spaceplane
- From: Eric Chomko
- Re: Lynx Spaceplane
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: Lynx Spaceplane
- From: Brian Thorn
- Re: Lynx Spaceplane
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: Lynx Spaceplane
- From: Brian Thorn
- Re: Lynx Spaceplane
- From: Pat Flannery
- Lynx Spaceplane
- Prev by Date: Re: Lynx Spaceplane
- Next by Date: Re: Lynx Spaceplane
- Previous by thread: Re: Lynx Spaceplane
- Next by thread: Re: Lynx Spaceplane
- Index(es):