Re: What a difference 40 years makes

Why did JAXA revise/modify those images, so as to exclude the mineral
color saturation or natural hues of the physically dark moon, along
with such a colorful Earth rising in the very same FOV?
.. - Brad Guth

Alan Erskine wrote:
In 1968, Apollo 8 took the famous Earth Rise image; now the Japanese have
taken a much sharper image
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2008/04/img/20080411_kaguya_02.jpg Shows an image
of Earth Rise taken by a Japanese probe called Kayuga
(http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2008/04/20080411_kaguya_e.html#ref01)

The image quality beats the daylights out of those taken by Apollo 8 in
1968. The camera on the Kayuga is digital, whereas the cameras used by
Apollo were film. The technological changes in 40 years are incredible.

I found the link in sci.space.news which was posted by Andrew Yee.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Camelot on the Moon - From Our Archives
    ... the Apollo 11 camera was monochrome. ... > until Apollo 14 that we got color images from the moon's surface in ... And the monochrome images from 11 were pretty awful due to ...
    (comp.dcom.telecom)
  • Re: What a difference 40 years makes
    ... a high end film camera is still superior to ... However, the famous Apollo 8 earthrise photo is very good, all things ...
    (sci.space.history)
  • Re: If the moon landing was faked...
    ... I observe hard vacuum and low G. ... camera from Surveyor 3 supposedly brought back from the Moon by Apollo ...
    (sci.space.history)
  • Re: What a difference 40 years makes
    ... taken a much sharper image ... The Apollo 8 image is still better. ... a high end film camera is still superior to ... However, the famous Apollo 8 earthrise photo is very good, all things ...
    (sci.space.history)