Re: Phoenix discussions

On Tue, 27 May 2008 18:23:20 GMT, fairwater@xxxxxxxxx (Derek Lyons)
wrote:

"Alan Erskine" <alan.erskine@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Kevin Willoughby" <kevinwilloughby@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > wrote in message
news:MPG.22a5475c6d264b409896bf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <4fC_j.4896$IK1.2694@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
alan.erskine@xxxxxxxxxxx says...

Can additional groups be added to the sci.space hierachy?

Sure. It's a well defined process. But do you really think that will
solve the problem?

It may not solve it, but it will aleviate it.

It will neither solve it nor alleviate it. The denizens of
sci.space.* are not well known for the ability to post messages into
the appropriate groups - rather they routinely post wherever they hell
the feel like.

Was that last bit supposed to mean something? Are the 'they' and the
'the' reversed, maybe?

Actually, I'm more curious as to why you never acknowledged my
correction of your claim that the Orbiter never landed on the lakebed,
only on the paved runway, at Edwards AFB.

Mary "Not that I'm disputing your claim about sci.space.* posters"
--
Mary Shafer Retired aerospace research engineer
We didn't just do weird stuff at Dryden, we wrote reports about it.
reunite.gondwana@xxxxxxxxx or miliff@xxxxxxxx
Visit my blog at http://thedigitalknitter.blogspot.com/
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Phoenix discussions
    ... but it will aleviate it. ... sci.space.* are not well known for the ability to post messages into ... correction of your claim that the Orbiter never landed on the lakebed, ... only on the paved runway, ...
    (sci.space.history)
  • Re: Phoenix discussions
    ... but it will aleviate it. ... sci.space.* are not well known for the ability to post messages into ... To be more temperate in my postings. ... Oct 5th, 2004 JDL ...
    (sci.space.history)