Re: .. What if Tom Hanks filmed the...Future...of NASA instead of it's past?
- From: OM <om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:55:51 -0500
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:00:52 -0500, Pat Flannery <flanner@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
but the basic energy use profile of a VTOL flying
machine is poor in comparison to a wheeled vehicle, and its failure
modes generally a lot more severe.
....The energy source problem is solved by killing all the hippies and
treehuggers standing in the way of safe nuclear power development. The
rotor problem has a fix of sorts, but it means squat if the blades
have been sheared off. That's the part they can't fix, unless they can
develop a safety device that either automatically steers you towards
an outdoor display promoting a wholesale bulk foam distributor's
convention, or can instantly produce said underneath the chopper *and*
makes sure it's upright -before- impact.
OM
--
]=====================================[
] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [
] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [
] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [
]=====================================[
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: .. What if Tom Hanks filmed the...Future...of NASA instead of it's past?
- From: Williamknowsbest
- Re: .. What if Tom Hanks filmed the...Future...of NASA instead of it's past?
- Prev by Date: Re: ...Robotic vs. Manned Space Flight? It's a Tie!
- Next by Date: Re: TV afterApollo 11 sequential recordings
- Previous by thread: Re: .. What if Tom Hanks filmed the...Future...of NASA instead of it's past?
- Next by thread: Re: .. What if Tom Hanks filmed the...Future...of NASA instead of it's past?
- Index(es):