Re: The War We Refuse To Win
From: Scott Lowther (scottlowtherHATESSPAM_at_ix.netcomARGH.com)
Date: 06/02/04
- Next message: Doug...: "Re: Asteroids or bust!"
- Previous message: Tom Merkle: "Re: JP Aerospace"
- In reply to: TKalbfus: "Re: The War We Refuse To Win"
- Next in thread: G EddieA95: "Re: The War We Refuse To Win"
- Reply: G EddieA95: "Re: The War We Refuse To Win"
- Reply: Sander Vesik: "Re: The War We Refuse To Win"
- Reply: Eric Chomko: "Re: The War We Refuse To Win"
- Reply: Hop David: "Re: The War We Refuse To Win"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2004 04:48:02 GMT
TKalbfus wrote:
> No one will pay $100 per gallon of gas where it will cost $1,000 dollars to
> fill a 10 gallon tank of a $10,000 car.
Oh, coem now. John Heinz-Kerry would pay it without batting an eyelid,
and would wonder why the peasants are gettign snippy.
> Alternate fuels become compeditive way before
> $100 per gallon. Pure Ethenol costs less than that, so if gas prices ever went
> so high, automobiles would most likely be converted to run on ethenol and
> perhaps biodiesel.
Forget that. If petroleum gets too expensive, we should run our cars
on... gasoline. Produced via thermal depolymerization from garbage.
Google on "turkey fuel."
-- Scott Lowther, Engineer Remove the obvious (capitalized) anti-spam gibberish from the reply-to e-mail address
- Next message: Doug...: "Re: Asteroids or bust!"
- Previous message: Tom Merkle: "Re: JP Aerospace"
- In reply to: TKalbfus: "Re: The War We Refuse To Win"
- Next in thread: G EddieA95: "Re: The War We Refuse To Win"
- Reply: G EddieA95: "Re: The War We Refuse To Win"
- Reply: Sander Vesik: "Re: The War We Refuse To Win"
- Reply: Eric Chomko: "Re: The War We Refuse To Win"
- Reply: Hop David: "Re: The War We Refuse To Win"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]