Re: beanstalks (was Re: Metallic hydrogen ...)
From: James Nicoll (jdnicoll_at_panix.com)
Date: 06/10/04
- Next message: Scott Lowther: "Re: A Reagan quote"
- Previous message: Gregg: "Re: Uses of Bulk Nano Materials (was beanstalks)"
- In reply to: Henry Spencer: "Re: beanstalks (was Re: Metallic hydrogen ...)"
- Next in thread: Henry Spencer: "Re: beanstalks (was Re: Metallic hydrogen ...)"
- Reply: Henry Spencer: "Re: beanstalks (was Re: Metallic hydrogen ...)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 9 Jun 2004 22:39:08 -0400
In article <Hz2DwM.22x@spsystems.net>,
Henry Spencer <henry@spsystems.net> wrote:
>
>There is no theoretical reason why rockets cannot get stuff into orbit for
>$5-10/kg. The only fundamental limit is that you need $3-4 worth of LOX
>plus a cheap hydrocarbon (kerosene, propane, whatever) to get a kilogram
>of dry mass into orbit, and some of the dry mass will be hardware rather
>than payload, and there will be some overhead for wear and tear on the
>hardware.
>
I was looking at Ultimate Rockets (Rockets so advanced that
the main cost is fuel) last year. As far as I could tell, LOX is
cheap ($0.10/kg) and H is expensive ($3.60/kg). In a lot of the
systems the H2 was -the- cost-defining expendible material used.
For some reason I never got around to pricing standard fuels
like kerosene.
In any case, I don't think you will use up $3-4 worth of LOX
per kg of dry mass. Maybe of payload...
-- "The keywords for tonight are Caution and Flammability." JFK, _Bubba Ho Tep_
- Next message: Scott Lowther: "Re: A Reagan quote"
- Previous message: Gregg: "Re: Uses of Bulk Nano Materials (was beanstalks)"
- In reply to: Henry Spencer: "Re: beanstalks (was Re: Metallic hydrogen ...)"
- Next in thread: Henry Spencer: "Re: beanstalks (was Re: Metallic hydrogen ...)"
- Reply: Henry Spencer: "Re: beanstalks (was Re: Metallic hydrogen ...)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|