Re: Colonizing the Galaxy in Eight Easy Steps
From: Albert (alwagner_at_tcac.net)
Date: 06/13/04
- Next message: Mary Shafer: "Re: SS1 flight set for June 21"
- Previous message: Josh Rosenbluth: "Re: OT: Actual Budget numbers was Re: A Reagan quote"
- In reply to: michael: "Re: Colonizing the Galaxy in Eight Easy Steps"
- Next in thread: michael: "Re: Colonizing the Galaxy in Eight Easy Steps"
- Reply: michael: "Re: Colonizing the Galaxy in Eight Easy Steps"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 21:35:46 -0500
On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 12:35:24 +1000
"michael" <copsR@yourdoor.com> wrote:
> "quibbler" <quibbler247@yahoo.com> says:
>
> > Unfortunately your *reductio ad absurdum* doesn't work. One
> > certainly can produce steam more efficiently by reducing pressure.
>
> But you can't use it to turn a turbine more
> effectively. Lower pressure means the steam
> does less work turning the blades. Duh-oh?
Quibbler is correct. And you are wrong. It is the difference in
pressure between the input and exhaust that allows work to be done. The
greater the difference the more work. Condensing the waste steam at the
exhaust increases the pressure differential and hence increases the
efficiency.
<snip>
-- "Let me give you a definition of ethics: It is good to maintain and further life; it is bad to damage and destroy life." -- Albert Schweitzer
- Next message: Mary Shafer: "Re: SS1 flight set for June 21"
- Previous message: Josh Rosenbluth: "Re: OT: Actual Budget numbers was Re: A Reagan quote"
- In reply to: michael: "Re: Colonizing the Galaxy in Eight Easy Steps"
- Next in thread: michael: "Re: Colonizing the Galaxy in Eight Easy Steps"
- Reply: michael: "Re: Colonizing the Galaxy in Eight Easy Steps"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|