Re: An answer to the space elevator
From: James Bowery (jim_bowery_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 06/28/04
- Next message: James Bowery: "Re: An answer to the space elevator"
- Previous message: Abdul Ahad: "Re: What's slowing down the two Voyagers?"
- In reply to: Joe Strout: "Re: An answer to the space elevator"
- Next in thread: James Bowery: "Re: An answer to the space elevator"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 28 Jun 2004 00:48:13 -0700
Joe Strout <joe@strout.net> wrote in message news:<joe-91AEA6.19435327062004@comcast.dca.giganews.com>...
> In article <2c4d4d0a.0406271309.1cbb092b@posting.google.com>,
> jim_bowery@hotmail.com (James Bowery) wrote:
>
> > Is there anything likely come along in the near future that could take
> > paylods to 100km and mach 12?
>
> Suborbital rockets will probably get there in the near future. I'm
> actually less optimistic about advanced airbreathing designs, but only
> time will tell.
Precisely my point when I said:
Is there anything likely come along in the near future that could take
paylods to 100km and mach 12?
Probably the same thing that is driving the bureaucrats to make all
this noise about space elevators now.
- Next message: James Bowery: "Re: An answer to the space elevator"
- Previous message: Abdul Ahad: "Re: What's slowing down the two Voyagers?"
- In reply to: Joe Strout: "Re: An answer to the space elevator"
- Next in thread: James Bowery: "Re: An answer to the space elevator"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]