Re: Reuseable technology

From: Rand Simberg (simberg_at_interglobal.org)
Date: 07/15/04


Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 20:25:52 GMT

Peter Fairbrother wrote:

>Jeff Findley wrote:
>
>
>
>>"Peter Fairbrother" <zenadsl6186@zen.co.uk> wrote in message
>>news:BD1A16E4.54982%zenadsl6186@zen.co.uk...
>>
>>
>>>Jeff Findley wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>That was my thought as well. Even ignoring launch, reentry, and launch
>>>>prep, rendezvous and docking isn't something that's typically done this
>>>>quickly. Given enough fuel, some portions of the rendezvous part could
>>>>
>>>>
>>be
>>
>>
>>>>sped up, but the close proximity operations and docking likely can't be
>>>>
>>>>
>>sped
>>
>>
>>>>up too much, or else you're risking the vehicle and station if something
>>>>goes wrong.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>You can only get about 6 flights a day from a SSTO, eight if you go
>>>fulltime. You have to go round at least once, taking ~90 minutes. Then you
>>>have to wait for the next launch window, after two orbits of the station.
>>>
>>>
>>You are making (implicit) assumptions about orbital dynamics, including the
>>more specific relm of rendezvous and docking, this doesn't seem possible.
>>It may be possible by expending, *a lot* of fuel, but you are seriously
>>underestimating the amount of fuel necessary to do a "worst case" "catch up"
>>to ISS within one orbit.
>>
>>
>
>I am making no such assumptions. There is no "catching up" involved.
>
>Take-offs are 180 minutes, or two orbit periods apart.
>
>You take off, and after fifteen minutes you are at the station. You stay
>there until you get near your starting point. You then reenter and land,
>about 110 minutes after takeoff. If you takeoff again 70 minutes later, when
>you get to orbit the station will be pretty near where you are.
>
Not unless you're going to an equatorial station. Otherwise you have
both launch and deorbit windows.



Relevant Pages

  • ISS reboost today -- surprise!!! (?)
    ... Space Station's orbit by about three kilometers. ... the station will be given an impulse of 1.79 m per ... which we expect will raise the average orbital altitude of the ISS ... by approximately three kilometers," Mission Control said. ...
    (sci.space.station)
  • Re: Reuseable technology
    ... > more specific relm of rendezvous and docking, ... > to ISS within one orbit. ... or two orbit periods apart. ... SSTO unless you drop your cargo off in orbit - which is entirely possible. ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: superhero space navigation
    ... and sometimes a Space Shuttle or Soyuz). ... station in a bit higher orbit to avoid any confusion. ... A space station of comparable to the ISS in an unusual orbit is not particularly good for that. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.science)
  • Re: Can they still go back to ISS?
    ... I think the point is that at the moment, the orbit is the same as the ISS, ... they no longer have enough gas to stop and head back to the station. ... the fuel for it of course, ...
    (sci.space.shuttle)
  • Re: Orbiter can save itself!
    ... Why not unman the shuttle converting it to FREIGHT ONLY and finish the ... nearby shuttle or a dedicated ISS does the same. ... you need at least 2, possibly 4 shuttle crew to perform a docking; and Shuttle and Soyuz use incompatible docking systems. ...
    (sci.space.shuttle)