Re: Kazakh space plans
From: Damon Hill (damon1six1_at_comcast.comma)
Date: 07/18/04
- Next message: Henry Spencer: "Re: 100 megaton bombs atop Saturn V rockets"
- Previous message: Damon Hill: "Re: Kazakh space plans"
- In reply to: David M. Palmer: "Re: Kazakh space plans"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 16:24:20 -0500
"David M. Palmer" <dmpalmer@email.com> wrote in
news:180720041009317805%dmpalmer@email.com:
> In article <Xns952919C877EFBdamon161attbicom@216.196.97.134>, Damon
> Hill <damon1six1@comcast.comma> wrote:
>> Quasi-nonsensical statements like this always make me twitch.
>
> And of course you can complain equally about 'solid fuel rockets'.
> With the exception of Spaceship 1 the correct term should almost
> always be "solid fuel-oxidizer mixture rocket".
>
> And even worse is when they say "solid rocket". As opposed to what;
> an aerospike?
>
> Good lord, you must be a twitching blob of jelly by now. (I am too,
> but in my case it's just lack of exercise.)
>
One builds up a tolerance; I've become fairly elastic.
Occasionly, I snap.
--Damon
- Next message: Henry Spencer: "Re: 100 megaton bombs atop Saturn V rockets"
- Previous message: Damon Hill: "Re: Kazakh space plans"
- In reply to: David M. Palmer: "Re: Kazakh space plans"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]