Re: Mountains Rush and Moore

From: Eric Chomko (echomko_at__at_polaris.umuc.edu)
Date: 07/20/04 

Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 13:24:30 +0000 (UTC)

Scott M. Kozel (kozelsm@attbi.com) wrote:
: echomko_at_@polaris.umuc.edu (Eric Chomko) wrote:
: >
: > Scott M. Kozel (kozelsm@attbi.com) wrote:
: > : echomko_at_@polaris.umuc.edu (Eric Chomko) wrote:
: > : > Scott M. Kozel (kozelsm@attbi.com) wrote:
: > : > : echomko_at_@polaris.umuc.edu (Eric Chomko) wrote:
: > : > : > Scott M. Kozel (kozelsm@attbi.com) wrote:
: > : > : >
: > : > : > : Whatever you call it, nobody is ever prosecuted for doing what Rush did
: > : > : > : -- he used prescription pain killers to try to deal with chronic and
: > : > : > : severe back pain.
: > : > : >
: > : > : > Rush's use of drugs was beyond use for pain.
: > : >
: > : > : Prove it, Chomko. Pure speculation on your part.
: > : >
: > : > He was addicted and only when confronted with legal action did he admit
: > : > that he had a problem.
: >
: > : Prove that "Rush's use of drugs was beyond use for pain", or shut up.
: >
: > Well, he could have easily gotten Dr.'s prescription for pain. Easily.

: Rush got legal prescriptions for legal medications.

Initially, yes. Then he went through his house keeper and bought them on
the street just like illegal drugs.

: The only statute
: where he lives that could possibly affect him, is the "doctor shopping"
: statute, and that is the statute that has never before been invoked in
: the jurisdiction where he lives. No charge has been filed against Rush,

None yet, as be probably bought his way out of trouble, or maybe his
employer did.

: and if one is, it should be fairly easy for his attorney to get the
: charge dismissed as being unconstitutional, as being "arbitrary and
: capricious" enforcement of the law, and he might even bring counter
: charges in federal court against the prosecutor for malicious
: prosecution and violation of civil rights.

What that he pissed off a former employee and she ratted him out? I wonder
what his most recent former wife knows and how much she is blackmailing
him for? No doubt that the alimony she gets has extra "hush" money
included. Limbaugh mught be worse than the Kennedys when it comes to
paying out blakcmail "hush" money. LOL

: > But being an addict he had to go the illegal route. So maybe you should
: > stop apologizing for that addict, you sap.

: I did a Google newsgroups search to find out what you had to say about
: Clinton's legal problems in 1998, and I see that you were a big time
: Clinton apologist, and that you argued that he should fact no legal
: consequences for his perjury (a felony) to a federal judge and grand
: jury, something that most of us would spend several years in prison for
: if committed.

Totallly false. No person other than the president or maybe another
national politician would even go to a grand jury to be questioned about
having had sex. No one! Your analogy is false on its face.

: Given that the president is supposed to be a moral and
: ethical leader of the country, your position on Rush makes you both a
: hypocrite and a chump.

Heh, go *** yourself...

: Chump.

: > Eric

: chump
: n.
: A stupid or foolish person; a dolt.

: [Perhaps blend of chunk, and lump or stump.]

But still way ahead of you, jackass.

: Source: The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language,
: Fourth Edition
: Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
: Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
: ....

: chump

: n : a person who is gullible and easy to take advantage of [syn: fish,
: fool, gull, mark, patsy, fall guy, sucker, schlemiel, shlemiel, soft
: touch, mug]

: Source: WordNet ® 1.6, © 1997 Princeton University

: http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=chump

: --

Schmuck: Scott Kozel.

I saw your site. Who gives rat's ass about a bunch or roads?

Eric

Quantcast