Re: 100 megaton bombs atop Saturn V rockets
From: Derek Lyons (fairwater_at_gmail.com)
Date: 07/20/04
- Next message: Derek Lyons: "Re: 100 megaton bombs atop Saturn V rockets"
- Previous message: John Kepler: "Re: We Should Demand Nasa Explain The Rover Science Embargo!"
- In reply to: Henry Spencer: "Re: 100 megaton bombs atop Saturn V rockets"
- Next in thread: Carey Sublette: "Re: 100 megaton bombs atop Saturn V rockets"
- Reply: Carey Sublette: "Re: 100 megaton bombs atop Saturn V rockets"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 16:38:05 GMT
henry@spsystems.net (Henry Spencer) wrote:
>For purposes of reference, the MIT Project Icarus effort assumed 5.5 kt/kg
>(a 100MT bomb weighing 40klb before the addition of spaceflight packaging).
Almost certainly such a weapon would be *far* lighter today. Not only
because of the overall increase in efficiency, but because each stage
adds a multiple of the explosive power, while adding a fraction of the
weight.
I've crossed this to a.w.n. as the folks there will know better than
the folks here.
D.
-- Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh.
- Next message: Derek Lyons: "Re: 100 megaton bombs atop Saturn V rockets"
- Previous message: John Kepler: "Re: We Should Demand Nasa Explain The Rover Science Embargo!"
- In reply to: Henry Spencer: "Re: 100 megaton bombs atop Saturn V rockets"
- Next in thread: Carey Sublette: "Re: 100 megaton bombs atop Saturn V rockets"
- Reply: Carey Sublette: "Re: 100 megaton bombs atop Saturn V rockets"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
