Re: SPACE PRIZE
From: Renee Keller (kellerr13_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 07/25/04
- Next message: Charles Buckley: "Re: SPACE PRIZE"
- Previous message: Renee Keller: "Re: SPACE PRIZE"
- Maybe in reply to: Renee Keller: "SPACE PRIZE"
- Next in thread: Charles Buckley: "Re: SPACE PRIZE"
- Reply: Charles Buckley: "Re: SPACE PRIZE"
- Reply: Derek Lyons: "Re: SPACE PRIZE"
- Reply: Perplexed in Peoria: "Re: SPACE PRIZE"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 23:29:55 GMT
"Greg D. Moore (Strider)" <mooregr_deleteth1s@greenms.com> wrote in message
news:nkVMc.95019$iJ4.34305@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
>
>
> BFD. What people really want is to get into space. If you limit the
> possibilities you're only hurting yourself.
>
I don't know why you have trouble understanding this. Comercial Sea Planes
have existed as long as comercial land planes. But you don't see nearly as
many passangers for seaplanes. That is for a number of reasons. Nobody
wants to have to drive to a lake or the ocean to take a plane. A Land based
system has proven to be much more popular. It is also more popular for
cargo. That is because of convience. If planes only developed in water, we
would be as advanced as we are because it would be too costly to get
landlocked stuff overseas. Now if we lived in the water, it might be a
better way, but we live on land, so it must be close. Even if a water
recovery craft did better, eventually it would have to be land based. The
goal is to make that leap in technology NOW, not later.
- Next message: Charles Buckley: "Re: SPACE PRIZE"
- Previous message: Renee Keller: "Re: SPACE PRIZE"
- Maybe in reply to: Renee Keller: "SPACE PRIZE"
- Next in thread: Charles Buckley: "Re: SPACE PRIZE"
- Reply: Charles Buckley: "Re: SPACE PRIZE"
- Reply: Derek Lyons: "Re: SPACE PRIZE"
- Reply: Perplexed in Peoria: "Re: SPACE PRIZE"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|