Re: rebuttal to Jeffrey Bell on "StuntShipOne"
From: Jeff Findley (jeff.findley_at_ugs.nojunk.com)
Date: 08/09/04
- Next message: Herm: "Re: X-Prize: Da Vinci to fly Oct. 2nd"
- Previous message: Jeff Findley: "Re: Cheap access to space"
- In reply to: Rand Simberg: "Re: rebuttal to Jeffrey Bell on "StuntShipOne""
- Next in thread: Rand Simberg: "Re: rebuttal to Jeffrey Bell on "StuntShipOne""
- Reply: Rand Simberg: "Re: rebuttal to Jeffrey Bell on "StuntShipOne""
- Reply: Henry Spencer: "Re: rebuttal to Jeffrey Bell on "StuntShipOne""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 10:10:01 -0400
"Rand Simberg" <newsgroups@transterrestrial.com> wrote in message
news:iHARc.13924$cK.4290@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> Henry Spencer wrote:
>
> > Oooh, a chance to correct Mary on aviation! :-)
> >
> > The Harrier has an RCS. It uses vectored thrust for lift, but not for
> > control. For control in hover, there's a set of air jets in nose, tail,
> > and wingtips, fed by warm high-pressure air tapped off the engine
> > compressor. And yes, "reaction control system" is what it's called.
>
> But it wouldn't work in space...
It would if you come up with another source for your high pressure air. The
simplest thing I can think of would be compressed nitrogen or a gas
generator of some sort. For short, sub-orbital hops, you might just be able
to make such a system work.
Jeff
-- Remove icky phrase from email address to get a valid address.
- Next message: Herm: "Re: X-Prize: Da Vinci to fly Oct. 2nd"
- Previous message: Jeff Findley: "Re: Cheap access to space"
- In reply to: Rand Simberg: "Re: rebuttal to Jeffrey Bell on "StuntShipOne""
- Next in thread: Rand Simberg: "Re: rebuttal to Jeffrey Bell on "StuntShipOne""
- Reply: Rand Simberg: "Re: rebuttal to Jeffrey Bell on "StuntShipOne""
- Reply: Henry Spencer: "Re: rebuttal to Jeffrey Bell on "StuntShipOne""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]