Re: Not all X-Prize flights go smooth...
From: Joe Strout (joe_at_strout.net)
Date: 08/12/04
- Next message: Explorer8939: "Re: Robotic Hubble mission would cost $2 billion"
- Previous message: Jeff Findley: "Re: Robotic Hubble mission would cost $2 billion"
- In reply to: rem642b_at_Yahoo.Com: "Re: Not all X-Prize flights go smooth..."
- Next in thread: Jack Sprat: "Re: Not all X-Prize flights go smooth..."
- Reply: Jack Sprat: "Re: Not all X-Prize flights go smooth..."
- Reply: redneckj: "Re: Not all X-Prize flights go smooth..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:07:51 -0500
In article <REM-2004aug11-005@Yahoo.Com>,
RobertMaas@YahooGroups.Com (rem642b@Yahoo.Com) wrote:
> > It was about $35,000 worth of hardware that was completely wrecked,
>
> For want of a $300-500 computer and some software, $35,000 was lost.
>
> > We are going to look into getting a continuous capacitive level
> > sensor next time so we can have a firm no-go line for liftoff.
>
> For want of ... how much would that cost? ... , $35,000 was lost.
Amazing, your hindsight seems to be 20/20!
Incidentally, how's your own vehicle development coming along?
,------------------------------------------------------------------.
| Joseph J. Strout Check out the Mac Web Directory: |
| joe@strout.net http://www.macwebdir.com |
`------------------------------------------------------------------'
- Next message: Explorer8939: "Re: Robotic Hubble mission would cost $2 billion"
- Previous message: Jeff Findley: "Re: Robotic Hubble mission would cost $2 billion"
- In reply to: rem642b_at_Yahoo.Com: "Re: Not all X-Prize flights go smooth..."
- Next in thread: Jack Sprat: "Re: Not all X-Prize flights go smooth..."
- Reply: Jack Sprat: "Re: Not all X-Prize flights go smooth..."
- Reply: redneckj: "Re: Not all X-Prize flights go smooth..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]