Re: OT: What does this imply for Michael moore??
From: Eric Chomko (echomko_at__at_polaris.umuc.edu)
Date: 09/03/04
- Next message: Patrick Doyle: "Airship to orbit -- isn't the buoyancy enough?"
- Previous message: Jupiter: "News reports of "ET" signal off-base, say scientists"
- In reply to: Rand Simberg: "Re: OT: What does this imply for Michael moore??"
- Next in thread: HAESSIG Frédéric Pierre Tamatoa: "Re: OT: What does this imply for Michael moore??"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 15:44:45 +0000 (UTC)
Rand Simberg (simberg.interglobal@org.trash) wrote:
: On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 19:15:56 +0000 (UTC), in a place far, far away,
: echomko_at_@polaris.umuc.edu (Eric Chomko) made the phosphor on my
: monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that:
: >: >Yes. What makes you think that Iraq won't go the way of Iran of 50 years
: >: >ago? The Shah by committee. Why do you think Iraq will be more like
: >: >Germany and Japan after WWII?
: >
: >: Because it's important.
: >
: >Could you be more vague? I bet you can't!
: Sure I can, but I wouldn't waste it on you.
Thanks, I'll take that as a compliment coming from you.
- Next message: Patrick Doyle: "Airship to orbit -- isn't the buoyancy enough?"
- Previous message: Jupiter: "News reports of "ET" signal off-base, say scientists"
- In reply to: Rand Simberg: "Re: OT: What does this imply for Michael moore??"
- Next in thread: HAESSIG Frédéric Pierre Tamatoa: "Re: OT: What does this imply for Michael moore??"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
