Re: Interstellar Propulsion idea using an Asteroid and a few comets!
From: Matthew Montchalin (montch_at_aracnet.com)
Date: 09/15/04
- Next message: Rand Simberg: "Re: OT Mushroom cloud in N. Korea"
- Previous message: Ian Stirling: "Re: Hurricane diversion."
- Maybe in reply to: AA Institute: "Re: Interstellar Propulsion idea using an Asteroid and a few comets!"
- Next in thread: Matthew Montchalin: "Re: Interstellar Propulsion idea using an Asteroid and a few comets!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 03:54:29 -0700
Rob Dekker wrote:
|That's nice for air, but you cannot do the same thing with big objects
|like comets and asteroids that you find on your way to Centauri.
|If they hit the spacecraft engine at spacecraft speed (at 0.001c or
|so) then the spacecraft is no more.
For the most part, earth-based observatories would not be able to
detect the loss of such a ship traveling at 0.001c, but would a
Hubble-type observatory be able to see that kind of a collision?
For ordinary 'particle' sized impacts, wouldn't the ship just keep
going, even if the vehicle lost its ability to support life?
- Next message: Rand Simberg: "Re: OT Mushroom cloud in N. Korea"
- Previous message: Ian Stirling: "Re: Hurricane diversion."
- Maybe in reply to: AA Institute: "Re: Interstellar Propulsion idea using an Asteroid and a few comets!"
- Next in thread: Matthew Montchalin: "Re: Interstellar Propulsion idea using an Asteroid and a few comets!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|