Re: Hubble versus the Antarctic telescope

From: hop (hellsownpuppy_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 09/20/04 

Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 09:03:37 -0500

Jim Kingdon <kingdon@panix.com> wrote in message news:<p4wmzzmew8r.fsf@panix5.panix.com>...
> And as for being better than Hubble, I'm sure it depends on what you
> are doing. It won't do Ultraviolet, I'd be fairly confident in
> saying.
Are you sure ? This may be the silver lining of the ozone hole...

Mostly joking. Anyone know how much of a difference it would make for
astronomical purposes ?