Re: CO2 and global warming

From: Martin Frey (martinfrey_at_snipclara.co.uk)
Date: 09/25/04


Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 14:57:08 +0100

simberg.interglobal@org.trash (Rand Simberg) wrote:

>>I should have said regulations relaxed or dismantled and EPO budget
>>slashed. The effect is easier access to national parks for industry,
>>more tolerance of surface water pollution, relaxation of the clean air
>>acts and the list goes on and on.
>
>None of which are going to lead to the apocalypse.

I agree - but they are bad judgement and call into question the
judgement on Kyoto. I know you have Limbaugh - no, not Limbaugh but
someone who sounds similar, arguing against taking any action on
climate - but there's an awful lot more voices, every bit as well
qualified, suggesting that something needs to be done and done
urgently. (Evidence? - Google it yourself)

Of course lone voices can be right - but for every lone voice that
turns out to be right there are a thousand lone voices that are wrong.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: CO2 and global warming
    ... > I agree - but they are bad judgement and call into question the ... I know you have Limbaugh - no, ... Kyoto is a sham, always has been, always ... > turns out to be right there are a thousand lone voices that are wrong. ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: CO2 and global warming
    ... > I agree - but they are bad judgement and call into question the ... I know you have Limbaugh - no, ... Kyoto is a sham, always has been, always ... > turns out to be right there are a thousand lone voices that are wrong. ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: CO2 and global warming
    ... >>acts and the list goes on and on. ... I agree - but they are bad judgement and call into question the ... I know you have Limbaugh - no, ... turns out to be right there are a thousand lone voices that are wrong. ...
    (sci.astro)