Re: Spaceship One - a partial sucess.
From: Rand Simberg (simberg.interglobal_at_org.trash)
Date: 09/30/04
- Next message: Jeff Findley: "Re: Spaceship One stepping-stone or dead-end?"
- Previous message: Harald Kucharek: "Re: Spaceship One stepping-stone or dead-end?"
- Maybe in reply to: Stephen Souter: "Re: Spaceship One - a partial sucess."
- Next in thread: Eric Chomko: "Re: Spaceship One - a partial sucess."
- Reply: Eric Chomko: "Re: Spaceship One - a partial sucess."
- Reply: Edward Wright: "Re: Spaceship One - a partial sucess."
- Reply: Stephen Souter: "Re: Spaceship One - a partial sucess."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:27:53 GMT
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:19:23 GMT, in a place far, far away, "Greg D.
Moore \(Strider\)" <mooregr_deleteth1s@greenms.com> made the phosphor
on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that:
>> Which raises a issue: should prototypes have been allowed to qualify for
>> the X Prize?
>
>Of course. Or rather, why should it not?
And how would it be determined when a vehicle was no longer a
"prototype," and who would make that determination?
This is silly.
- Next message: Jeff Findley: "Re: Spaceship One stepping-stone or dead-end?"
- Previous message: Harald Kucharek: "Re: Spaceship One stepping-stone or dead-end?"
- Maybe in reply to: Stephen Souter: "Re: Spaceship One - a partial sucess."
- Next in thread: Eric Chomko: "Re: Spaceship One - a partial sucess."
- Reply: Eric Chomko: "Re: Spaceship One - a partial sucess."
- Reply: Edward Wright: "Re: Spaceship One - a partial sucess."
- Reply: Stephen Souter: "Re: Spaceship One - a partial sucess."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]