Re: Selective Service begins Hiring, Bush May Reinstate Military Draft

From: Dale (dmh7_at_citilink.com)
Date: 10/12/04 

Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 00:06:58 -0500

Soldier wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 04:52:44 -0400, "Jonathan" <jon@home.com> blurted:
>
>
>>"Rand Simberg" <simberg.interglobal@org.trash> wrote in message
>>news:417a1be5.111350313@news.west.earthlink.net...
>>
>>>On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 21:16:52 -0500, in a place far, far away, Dale
>>><dmh7@citilink.com> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way
>>>as to indicate that:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>There's lies, there's more lies, and then there's anti-Bush left-wingers. This
>>>>>one should make it to snopes.com eventually.
>>>>
>>>>Since you are so vociferous on the point, PROVE that the draft won't be
>>>>reinstated.
>>>
>>>What a curiously stupid demand.
>>
>>
>>Not at all, the poster called my opinion/speculation of a future
>>possibility a "lie".
>
>
> Not necessarily. My comment could stand alone completely independent of your
> opinion/speculation.
>

So now it's you who are the liar. My comment is quite to the point: you
said we were liars for stating just the possibility that the draft
xcould be reinstated. If so, then you must either have proof that this
is NOT a possibility, or you are lying yourself. It's that simple. Seems
you're indulging in flip-flopping.

Your response was directly to the comment: now either prove the draft
will not be re-instated, or admit your comment is what it appears to be:
unadulterated bull***.

dmh

Quantcast