Re: Vote for Bush! Re: Pres Bush Left
From: Eric Chomko (echomko_at__at_polaris.umuc.edu)
Date: 10/21/04
- Next message: Bob Casanova: "Re: History's Worst Presidential Candidate"
- Previous message: Rand Simberg: "Re: [OT] Re: anti-Kerry documentary vs. Moore's antiBush documentary"
- In reply to: mcook_at_prodigy.net: "Re: Vote for Bush! Re: Pres Bush Left"
- Next in thread: Mark Cook: "Re: Vote for Bush! Re: Pres Bush Left"
- Reply: Mark Cook: "Re: Vote for Bush! Re: Pres Bush Left"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 20:37:00 +0000 (UTC)
mcook@prodigy.net (mcook@prodigy.net) wrote:
: echomko_at_@polaris.umuc.edu (Eric Chomko) wrote in message news:<cl68hv$7n5$4@news.ums.edu>...
: > Rand Simberg (simberg.interglobal@org.trash) wrote:
: > : On 19 Oct 2004 17:09:54 -0700, in a place far, far away,
: > : mcook@prodigy.net (mcook@prodigy.net) made the phosphor on my monitor
: > : glow in such a way as to indicate that:
: >
: > : >> : The only problem with this analysis is that the recount by the FSC was
: > : >> : non-binding. Bush was already the certified winner of the state. Under
: > : >> : the Electoral Count Act of 1887, Congress was not required to accept
: > : >> : the recount as ordered by the FSC.
: > : >>
: > : >> A fair society would have simply thrown out all the votes in FLA from
: > : >> election day except the absentee ballots and revoted the following
: > : >> Tuesday.
: > : >>
: > : >
: > : >That would be a violation of the US Constitution. The Electoral Count
: > : >Act of 1887 allows for Congress, i.e. our elected representatives, to
: > : >settle these disputes.
: >
: > : Eric doesn't care (or even know) about the Constitution. He just
: > : wants what he (delusionally) thinks is "fair."
: >
: > I sure as heck know how the Constitution gets trumped in the face of
: > "national security". Besides Congress did not select Bush, the Supreme
: > Court did. So what good does it do to reference the Constitution and
: > Congress's function when it wasn't even followed in 2000 election?
: >
: > No Rand, you're as clueless as ever.
: >
: If you really believe that the Supreme Court selected Bush, then you
: should be able to tell us how Gore would have won if the court did not
: get involved.
A simple revote one week later. Heck if they can oust the CA govenor and
hold a special election to vote in a new one, then we could have a special
election in the face of a tie as we did in FLA. Most votes wins the state.
No recount of the 2nd vote and no BS with chads, butterfly ballots or who
votes and does not. THAT would have been fair and THAT would have had Gore
the winner.
Eric
- Next message: Bob Casanova: "Re: History's Worst Presidential Candidate"
- Previous message: Rand Simberg: "Re: [OT] Re: anti-Kerry documentary vs. Moore's antiBush documentary"
- In reply to: mcook_at_prodigy.net: "Re: Vote for Bush! Re: Pres Bush Left"
- Next in thread: Mark Cook: "Re: Vote for Bush! Re: Pres Bush Left"
- Reply: Mark Cook: "Re: Vote for Bush! Re: Pres Bush Left"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|