Re: SPSs and the candidates (was: Re: History's Worst Presidential Candidate)
From: Alex Terrell (alexterrell_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 10/25/04
- Next message: James Nicoll: "Re: SPSs and the candidates (was: Re: History's Worst Presidential Candidate)"
- Previous message: Scott Hedrick: "Re: The City Of Melbourne Will Be Safe Tonight"
- In reply to: Mike Walsh: "Re: SPSs and the candidates (was: Re: History's Worst Presidential Candidate)"
- Next in thread: Ool: "Re: SPSs and the candidates (was: Re: History's Worst Presidential Candidate)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 25 Oct 2004 15:29:33 -0700
"Mike Walsh" <mp1walsh@adelphia.net> wrote in message news:<3JadnW_gK7Rd2-HcRVn-2A@adelphia.com>...
> Well, Rand's argument is that after the SPS is far enough down the
> development curve that the normal conditions of supply and demand
> and standard economic conditions will apply.
>
> I doubt that this will be true for early versions of SPS that will be
> test versions.
I think it'll be true for the first "Earth aimed" SPS, which will be
able to charge a significant premium for its electricity.
> My belief is that the first uses would be "off world"
> although you may quite properly say that isn't really SPS as we
> normally understand the term.
>
> That is correct, but the first step to getting a practical SPS is to
> develop the large amount of solar power required and you could
> probably test micro-wave power transmission to the lunar
> base that I suspect will be there well before a large and
> economical SPS can be developed.
>
Or, for example, SPS to power electric propulsion to bring back NEO
materials. As production is ramped up to get ever bigger NEOs, the SPS
for these missions would be about double what's avaiable for Earth
Orbiting SPS.
> SPS as an operational item can be a selling point for developing
> the space power systems but , in my opinion, it won't happen at
> all unless they are developed for use to provide space operational
> desires.
>
I think they can be a powerful driver for development, but at the
moment, without CATS, the pay back period is too long.
> Mike Walsh
- Next message: James Nicoll: "Re: SPSs and the candidates (was: Re: History's Worst Presidential Candidate)"
- Previous message: Scott Hedrick: "Re: The City Of Melbourne Will Be Safe Tonight"
- In reply to: Mike Walsh: "Re: SPSs and the candidates (was: Re: History's Worst Presidential Candidate)"
- Next in thread: Ool: "Re: SPSs and the candidates (was: Re: History's Worst Presidential Candidate)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|