Re: Why Conservatives Should Vote for Kerry
From: Steven P. McNicoll (roncachamp_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 10/27/04
- Next message: Scott Hedrick: "Re: The City Of Melbourne Will Be Safe Tonight"
- Previous message: Karl Johanson: "Re: Why Conservatives Should Vote for Kerry"
- In reply to: Karl Johanson: "Re: Why Conservatives Should Vote for Kerry"
- Next in thread: Karl Johanson: "Re: Why Conservatives Should Vote for Kerry"
- Reply: Karl Johanson: "Re: Why Conservatives Should Vote for Kerry"
- Reply: Eric Chomko: "Re: Why Conservatives Should Vote for Kerry"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 01:28:04 GMT
"Karl Johanson" <karljohanson@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:2CCfd.34401$%k.28916@pd7tw2no...
> "Steven P. McNicoll" <roncachamp@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:jujfd.8789
>
>> > 2. Kerry is, in the mold of Conservatives Americans can admire.
>> >
>>
>> There is nothing about Kerry that a conservative admires.
>
> "lib·er·al adj:
> a. Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or
> authoritarian
> attitudes, views, or dogmas; free from bigotry. b. Favoring proposals for
> reform, open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and
> behavior of others; broad-minded.
> The American Heritage ® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
>
That definition is obsolete. In American politics today liberal means
socialist.
- Next message: Scott Hedrick: "Re: The City Of Melbourne Will Be Safe Tonight"
- Previous message: Karl Johanson: "Re: Why Conservatives Should Vote for Kerry"
- In reply to: Karl Johanson: "Re: Why Conservatives Should Vote for Kerry"
- Next in thread: Karl Johanson: "Re: Why Conservatives Should Vote for Kerry"
- Reply: Karl Johanson: "Re: Why Conservatives Should Vote for Kerry"
- Reply: Eric Chomko: "Re: Why Conservatives Should Vote for Kerry"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|