Re: Manned Space Programs
From: Henry Spencer (henry_at_spsystems.net)
Date: 11/08/04
- Next message: Peter Stickney: "Re: Airborne lasers"
- Previous message: Henry Spencer: "Re: Manned Space Programs"
- In reply to: Paul Blay: "Re: Manned Space Programs"
- Next in thread: Henk Boonsma: "Re: Manned Space Programs"
- Reply: Henk Boonsma: "Re: Manned Space Programs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 15:53:27 GMT
In article <cmndkp$c0q$1$8302bc10@news.demon.co.uk>,
Paul Blay <ranma@saotome.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>>>wonder why Japan and the European Space Agency haven't developed manned
>>>launch vehicles.
>> Basically, because NASA talked them into participating in the space
>> station instead of proceeding with separate manned-spaceflight programs.
>
>And because /demonstrated/ manned-spaceflight has been darn expensive.
It's not like the Japanese and European space-station contributions have
been exactly cheap. They *had* the money.
--
"Think outside the box -- the box isn't our friend." | Henry Spencer
-- George Herbert | henry@spsystems.net
- Next message: Peter Stickney: "Re: Airborne lasers"
- Previous message: Henry Spencer: "Re: Manned Space Programs"
- In reply to: Paul Blay: "Re: Manned Space Programs"
- Next in thread: Henk Boonsma: "Re: Manned Space Programs"
- Reply: Henk Boonsma: "Re: Manned Space Programs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|