Re: Scram Success
From: Edward Wright (edwright2000_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 11/20/04
- Next message: Henry Spencer: "Re: Solar Power Satellites (Was: Re: Why Mars?)"
- Previous message: Mary Shafer: "Re: Getting Mega Projects Done"
- In reply to: Scott Lowther: "Re: Scram Success"
- Next in thread: Henk Boonsma: "Re: Scram Success"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 20 Nov 2004 14:33:34 -0800
Scott Lowther <scottlowther@ix.netcomSPAMBLOK.com> wrote in message news:<419C1E5A.6060709@ix.netcomSPAMBLOK.com>...
>>>Yes, for high speed intercontinental cruise missiles or perhaps hypersonic
>>>bombers. When the bomb absolutely, positively, has to get there as quickly
>>>as possible. ;-)
>> In that case, a ballistic missile is faster (and probably cheaper,
>> too).
> Not politically, though. People get in a twist when you start using
> ICBM's as conventional weapons. Considering that Boris Yeltsin nearly
> went nuclear over a sounding rocket fired from Norway (Finland?) that
You think he would have been more comfortable seeing a Mach 10 bomber?
- Next message: Henry Spencer: "Re: Solar Power Satellites (Was: Re: Why Mars?)"
- Previous message: Mary Shafer: "Re: Getting Mega Projects Done"
- In reply to: Scott Lowther: "Re: Scram Success"
- Next in thread: Henk Boonsma: "Re: Scram Success"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|