Re: More on the "Planet X" controversy.

From: DrPostman (Looky_at_mysig.foremail)
Date: 11/28/04 

Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 01:33:53 GMT

On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 01:36:09 GMT, jsavard@excxn.aNOSPAMb.cdn.invalid
(John Savard) in accordance with The Prophecy scribed:

>On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 07:11:15 GMT, jsavard@excxn.aNOSPAMb.cdn.invalid
>(John Savard) wrote, in part:
>>On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 18:15:36 -0600, Earl Colby Pottinger
>><earlcp@idirect.com> wrote, in part:
>
>>>That is your idea of a controversy? Boy, you live a sheltered life.
>
>>Not only that, but didn't he know that you don't dare refer to "Planet
>>***" in this newsgroup, for fear...
>
>Ah, no. It is sci.astro where they quake in terror at the thought Nancy
>might return.

Not really. I have Nancy quaking in terror over the questions I asked
her on the Lou Gentile Show a few nights ago. The old gal got so
frazzled she tried to talk over me. Then she fired off several posts
on GLP and TT-Watch. It was quite a meltdown. 

--
Dr.Postman USPS, MBMC, BsD;  "Disgruntled, But Unarmed"
Member,Board of Directors, afa-b, SKEP-TI-CULT® #15-51506-253. 
AFA-B Official Pollster & Hammer of Thor winner - August 2004
You can email me at: DrPostman(at)gmail.com
"Again, think type and _them_ make sure that your babble is understood in
the common ENGLISH language."
  -ExcrementOne displays his familiarity with irony

Relevant Pages