Re: Extremophile Mars - Johathon admits to his computer break-in at JPL.
From: jonathan (Write_at_Instead.com)
Date: 11/30/04
- Next message: george: "Re: Extremophile Mars - Johathon admits to his computer break-in at JPL."
- Previous message: Henry Spencer: "Re: Scram Success"
- In reply to: george: "Re: Extremophile Mars - Johathon admits to his computer break-in at JPL."
- Next in thread: george: "Re: Extremophile Mars - Johathon admits to his computer break-in at JPL."
- Reply: george: "Re: Extremophile Mars - Johathon admits to his computer break-in at JPL."
- Reply: John Thingstad: "Re: Extremophile Mars - Johathon admits to his computer break-in at JPL."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 19:58:46 -0500
"george" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote in message
news:Fbvqd.682376$8_6.145929@attbi_s04...
>
> "jonathan" <Write@Instead.com> wrote in message news:41aa475b$1_3@127.0.0.1...
> >
> > "george" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote in message
> > news:7fmqd.109605$5K2.28324@attbi_s03...
> >>
> >> "jonathan" <Write@Instead.com> wrote in message
> >> news:41a944d8$1_5@127.0.0.1...
> >
> >
> >
> > Your incredible exercise is denial snipped.......
> >
> >
> >
> >> SO, WHAT YOU ARE SAYING IS THAT YOU BROKE INTO JPL'S COMPUTER AND POSTED A
> >> HOAX,
> >> RIGHT?
> >
> > Not at all. I simply posted my opinion in their form. Nothing
> > illegal or even unethical about that. It's their sloppy
> > and naive mistake that led to publishing a simple
> > internet post. The internet is not publishing, but
> > simple speech, and the most protected form
> > of First Amendment speech that exists. My first
> > internet love is the subject of internet speech, and
> > I take an extreme position on that subject.
> >
> > Which is why I post through an anon remailer, to a
> > anon server, then through an encrypted shell.
>
> No, you post through an anonymous remailer because you are a troll and a
> criminal who doesn't want to get caught.
No, I do it to keep tight assed people from complaining
to my server.
> What you have yet to figure out is
> that when you *** around with federal government computers like you obviously
> have,
How so! I simply posted it to the ng. They decided to publish
it without even bothering to click the Nasa website to confirm
it. What kind of 'journalist' works like that? An irresponsible
one, that's who. Too lazy to even click his desktop icon to check
the story.
> they can get a subpoena in the blink of an eye and get your personal
> information from the log files of that "anonymous" remailer.
Oh you are just embarrassing yourself. Anon remailers do not
keep logs...at all. If I e-mailed them they would wipe even
that at the end of the day.
> It doesn't take
> the NSA to find you. It only takes a court order, dude.
Let me describe what it would take to track my good-for-nothing
rear end down. First they would trace my signal to the encrypted
server. They would have to crack the encryption to find out
what server it is. Of course that server doesn't keep any
logs and strips the headers before encrypting so it wouldn't
do any good. And it's in a Asian country so they'd have to
travel there to get a local court order. But even if they did
the signal would then be traced to a anon remailer which also
strips the headers and keeps no logs. This remailer is, of course, in
a former Soviet republic so they would have to travel to that
corrupt pro-Putin republic and get a court order there.
Only to find the remailer has no logs, but even if they
did get an order to get my personal data, they would
find I paid the bill with a money order from a 7-11
using a name not quite mine. I wonder how long it would
take them to find that money order? I don't know, a few
weeks or months I suppose. There are many anon
remailers so it's best to change them every so often.
Next time maybe I'll use your name on the check~
They'd have to want me really really bad...bin Laden
bad. All this for someone, like me, that hasn't even
broken a single law. I'm not even a plagiarist.
>
> > The NSA couldn't track me if I desired to elude
> > them. I was weaned on the net in the underground
> > ng's because of my determination to see it be
> > a free speech zone. Which means I've hung my
> > ass out against task forces and agencies that
> > would make bin-Landen shudder. In fact the
> > same ones chasing him now were formed
> > to silence the ng I used to post to.
> >
> > That ng was the one that trolled Congress into passing
> > the Communications Decency Act of 97, the act that
> > banned all adult speech on the internet. Leading to the
> > Supreme Court decision giving the internet First Amendment
> > protection for all time in Reno v The Aclu.
>
> So what you are saying is that not only are you a troll, but a pervert as well.
Yes, those free-speechers are sick~ Are you a republican?
> Why you make such incriminating statements about yourself is a mystery, except
> that I know that many criminals think they can't get caught and so often brag
> about their crimes. So what other illegal activities are you currently involved
> in, Johnny?
>
> > Trolling can be a good thing sometimes. If your
> > heart and mind are in the right place.
> >
> > Don't form a minute think I can be stopped from saying
> > whatever I like, wherever I like, in any form I care
> > to. It is our inalienable right to do just that, and the
> > freedom that will allow this world to someday
> > swim in beauty.
> >
>
> Keep believing that, Johnny boy. That's exactly what we want you to believe.
>
> >
> >>
> >> I believe my own eyes, and ears, and scientific judgment based on years of
> >> training and field work. And not only do you not hold up to that standard,
> >> you
> >> have shown yourself right here to be a fraud, and a hoaxter, and since you
> >> fucked with JPL's web site, that also makes you a criminal.
> >
> >
> > What I am trying to show is that the concepts of complexity science
> > allowed me to quickly converge extremely close to the
> > correct answer for the mystery of the century. And before
> > Nasa even determined Meridiani showed signs of water.
> > If a layman can figure it out ...six months...before the
> > entire weight of the scientific community can, the
> > quantum leap that is complexity science is demonstrated.
> > I am nothing, anon and meaningless, these concepts
> > are everything.
>
> Careful with that ego, or you will burst it and get it all over your monitor.
> Why you believe that you are the first to consider that Mars amy have had, or
> may still have water is an indication of your delusions of granduer. Take a
> pill, Johnny.
And all this time you've been arguing with me that Meridiani
shows only wind erosion. Why the sudden change of tune?
But I'll take your admission of defeat debating me in any
way it comes.
> <snipped the anarchist bible bull***>
You've called me a criminal, a pervert and now
an anarchist? Are you defending communist
China just to tweak my nose?
Have you no dignity man <g>
Jonathan
s
>
>
- Next message: george: "Re: Extremophile Mars - Johathon admits to his computer break-in at JPL."
- Previous message: Henry Spencer: "Re: Scram Success"
- In reply to: george: "Re: Extremophile Mars - Johathon admits to his computer break-in at JPL."
- Next in thread: george: "Re: Extremophile Mars - Johathon admits to his computer break-in at JPL."
- Reply: george: "Re: Extremophile Mars - Johathon admits to his computer break-in at JPL."
- Reply: John Thingstad: "Re: Extremophile Mars - Johathon admits to his computer break-in at JPL."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]