Re: Space Shuttle, Not Robot, Should Be Used to Service Telescope
From: Rand Simberg (simberg.interglobal_at_org.trash)
Date: 12/09/04
- Next message: Tom Kent: "Re: MSNBC - How a 'safe haven' could help save Hubble"
- Previous message: Michael Smith: "Re: MSNBC - How a 'safe haven' could help save Hubble"
- In reply to: Brian Gaff: "Re: Space Shuttle, Not Robot, Should Be Used to Service Telescope"
- Next in thread: Eric Chomko: "Re: Space Shuttle, Not Robot, Should Be Used to Service Telescope"
- Reply: Eric Chomko: "Re: Space Shuttle, Not Robot, Should Be Used to Service Telescope"
- Reply: Hop David: "Re: Space Shuttle, Not Robot, Should Be Used to Service Telescope"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 15:51:22 GMT
On Thu, 09 Dec 2004 11:20:53 GMT, in a place far, far away, "Brian
Gaff" <Briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> made the phosphor on my monitor glow
in such a way as to indicate that:
>
>Well, we surely all realise that using Astronauts is the most reliable way
>to service the telescope, and we also know there would be no shortage of
>volunteers to go.
Also (ironically, given how the robot folks are always telling us much
more cost effective they are) the cheapest.
- Next message: Tom Kent: "Re: MSNBC - How a 'safe haven' could help save Hubble"
- Previous message: Michael Smith: "Re: MSNBC - How a 'safe haven' could help save Hubble"
- In reply to: Brian Gaff: "Re: Space Shuttle, Not Robot, Should Be Used to Service Telescope"
- Next in thread: Eric Chomko: "Re: Space Shuttle, Not Robot, Should Be Used to Service Telescope"
- Reply: Eric Chomko: "Re: Space Shuttle, Not Robot, Should Be Used to Service Telescope"
- Reply: Hop David: "Re: Space Shuttle, Not Robot, Should Be Used to Service Telescope"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|