Re: Armchair analysis of Delta performance shortfall
From: Derek Lyons (fairwater_at_gmail.com)
Date: 12/31/04
- Next message: Joann Evans: "Re: Republican Victories & Space Exploration"
- Previous message: Charles Buckley: "Re: US/Russia Space Troubles"
- In reply to: Henry Spencer: "Re: Armchair analysis of Delta performance shortfall"
- Next in thread: Bill the Cat: "Re: Armchair analysis of Delta performance shortfall"
- Reply: Bill the Cat: "Re: Armchair analysis of Delta performance shortfall"
- Reply: Henry Spencer: "Re: Armchair analysis of Delta performance shortfall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 21:22:13 GMT
henry@spsystems.net (Henry Spencer) wrote:
>Second, the
>orbit you need to carry out the mission typically will not be the lowest
>possible orbit, so some small performance shortfall is still compatible
>with achieving a temporary orbit (especially since abandoning the primary
>mission frees up some OMS fuel etc.).
Which works so long as your 'mission' is as an independent orbiter.
For taxi and package delivery services, sans a tug, such performance
it unacceptable. (Even with a tug, there are going to be schedule
hits.)
D.
-- Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh. -Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings. Oct 5th, 2004 JDL
- Next message: Joann Evans: "Re: Republican Victories & Space Exploration"
- Previous message: Charles Buckley: "Re: US/Russia Space Troubles"
- In reply to: Henry Spencer: "Re: Armchair analysis of Delta performance shortfall"
- Next in thread: Bill the Cat: "Re: Armchair analysis of Delta performance shortfall"
- Reply: Bill the Cat: "Re: Armchair analysis of Delta performance shortfall"
- Reply: Henry Spencer: "Re: Armchair analysis of Delta performance shortfall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|