Re: Armchair analysis of Delta performance shortfall
From: Paul F. Dietz (dietz_at_dls.net)
Date: 01/09/05
- Next message: Kim Keller: "Re: Armchair analysis of Delta performance shortfall"
- Previous message: freddo411_at_gmail.com: "Re: Skycrane"
- In reply to: Dr John Stockton: "Re: Armchair analysis of Delta performance shortfall"
- Next in thread: Damon Hill: "Re: Armchair analysis of Delta performance shortfall"
- Reply: Damon Hill: "Re: Armchair analysis of Delta performance shortfall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 16:25:34 -0600
Dr John Stockton wrote:
> A small solid-fuel rocket fixed in the flame duct and ignited shortly
> before hydrogen release should shift said fireball out of harm's way -
> think water-jet suction pump, as used in chemistry labs. Be sure to fit
> it the right way round, and don't make it too big.
I suspect a steam jet would be cheaper (and more reusable.)
Paul
- Next message: Kim Keller: "Re: Armchair analysis of Delta performance shortfall"
- Previous message: freddo411_at_gmail.com: "Re: Skycrane"
- In reply to: Dr John Stockton: "Re: Armchair analysis of Delta performance shortfall"
- Next in thread: Damon Hill: "Re: Armchair analysis of Delta performance shortfall"
- Reply: Damon Hill: "Re: Armchair analysis of Delta performance shortfall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
