Re: Armchair analysis of Delta performance shortfall
From: Damon Hill (damon1six1_at_comcast.not)
Date: 01/10/05
- Next message: Tom: "Re: Skycrane"
- Previous message: Tom: "Re: Skycrane"
- In reply to: Paul F. Dietz: "Re: Armchair analysis of Delta performance shortfall"
- Next in thread: Kim Keller: "Re: Armchair analysis of Delta performance shortfall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 02:03:14 -0600
"Paul F. Dietz" <dietz@dls.net> wrote in news:rtmdnfRJi-bDMnzcRVn-
2A@dls.net:
> Dr John Stockton wrote:
>
>> A small solid-fuel rocket fixed in the flame duct and ignited shortly
>> before hydrogen release should shift said fireball out of harm's way -
>> think water-jet suction pump, as used in chemistry labs. Be sure to fit
>> it the right way round, and don't make it too big.
>
> I suspect a steam jet would be cheaper (and more reusable.)
As was done for the Vandenberg Shuttle launch pad? I assume that
was taken out when it was converted to Delta IV.
--Damon
- Next message: Tom: "Re: Skycrane"
- Previous message: Tom: "Re: Skycrane"
- In reply to: Paul F. Dietz: "Re: Armchair analysis of Delta performance shortfall"
- Next in thread: Kim Keller: "Re: Armchair analysis of Delta performance shortfall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|