Re: Jim Oberg - Anti-Kook
From: Thomas Lee Elifritz (crackpots_at_everywhere.net)
Date: 01/12/05
- Next message: Thomas Lee Elifritz: "Re: Anti-Satellite weapon system (was critic of US Space weaponry...)"
- Previous message: Thomas Lee Elifritz: "Re: Jim Oberg - Anti-Kook"
- In reply to: Mark Martin: "Re: Jim Oberg - Anti-Kook"
- Next in thread: qed100_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Jim Oberg - Anti-Kook"
- Reply: qed100_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Jim Oberg - Anti-Kook"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:00:15 GMT
January 12, 2005
Mark Martin wrote:
> Thomas Lee Elifritz wrote:
>
> > I do note with interest our regular crashing and landing of
> spaceships onto
> > alien planets and moons.
>
> Nice. Do you note with equal interest the number of successful
> spaceflights?
Did you notice the word 'landing'?
> By what do you gauge that we rightfully ought to have a
> higher success rate?
I gauged nothing, it was a thought provoking comment.
> Is interference by E.T. the only plausible reason
> for spacecraft malfunctions?
Now what kind of kook would infer that from my statement?
Thank you so much for thinking.
Thomas Lee Elifritz
http://elifritz.members.atlantic.net
- Next message: Thomas Lee Elifritz: "Re: Anti-Satellite weapon system (was critic of US Space weaponry...)"
- Previous message: Thomas Lee Elifritz: "Re: Jim Oberg - Anti-Kook"
- In reply to: Mark Martin: "Re: Jim Oberg - Anti-Kook"
- Next in thread: qed100_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Jim Oberg - Anti-Kook"
- Reply: qed100_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Jim Oberg - Anti-Kook"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|