Re: Jim Oberg - Anti-Kook

From: Thomas Lee Elifritz (crackpots_at_everywhere.net)
Date: 01/13/05

Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 00:25:48 GMT

January 12, 2005

Len Lekx wrote:

> Generalities like that are untenable, and do little to
> add credence to your remarks.

They're comments, usenet comments if you haven't noticed.

"Who needs credibility here?" Remember that?

Look at this place, a long thread discussing a fantasy of resurrecting the
Saturn V.

Now that's kooky.

Relevant Pages

Re: RADCOM DELIVERY
... Oh you wouldn't know how far I have moved on Gareth as I do not live on usenet and it plays no part in my life and is just the smallest of interests to me. ... I have directed no rude or snide remarks in your direction and if so, ... Grow up, Leigh! ...
(uk.radio.amateur)
Re: Curiously Amusing Harry Potter Puppets
... remarks regarding Linda Smith and the fact, or so you claimed, that ... Claiming 'victories' over usenet arguments is really quite lame. ...
(uk.media.tv.misc)
Re: Raleigh CDI
... I wouldnt sit quietly if someone said those remarks in person, ... dont know why I should let it go here in the rec. ... Responding doesn't make it stop. ... People become sociopaths on usenet - they simply ...
(rec.equestrian)
Re: M3 candidates? (Was : Re: Completely OT...)
... never profain on air or usenet. ... I didn't originate any personal remarks. ...
(uk.radio.amateur)
Re: Operations over water
... of credence by getting into a small plane with a CFI even once. ... I assume you mean credibility rather than credence. ... things up and verify them for himself; anyone who relies exclusively on USENET ...
(rec.aviation.piloting)