Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus
From: Brad Guth (bradguth_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 01/13/05
- Next message: Hop David: "Metallic Martian Meteorite?"
- Previous message: Mike Combs: "Re: What makes an ideal Moon base?"
- Next in thread: Brad Guth: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Reply: Brad Guth: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Reply: John Savard: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Reply: Tim K.: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Reply: Brad Guth: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Reply: Brett Zell: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Reply: KMoore: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Reply: Brad Guth: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Reply: Brad Guth: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Reply: Brad Guth: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 19:13:23 +0000 (UTC)
It seems that "sci.space.policy" is primarily established as to
know-thy-enemy and snooker-thy-humanity, as per avoiding and/or alluding
to whatever our moon is accessibly good for, and of what's most likely
artificial about Venus is almost as bad off and every bit lethal as the
collateral damage and carnage related to all the lies and many other
perpetrated disinformation factors about Iraq, China, Russia and
countless other nations on this continuing cold-war of our global energy
dominating hit-list.
For five years and counting (actually ever since before the Magellan
mission to Venus), and this is besides all of my observationology and my
subjective though honest interpretive contributions, there's always been
more scientific and physics proof-positive of other life making a go of
it upon Venus than of absolutely everything other than what's situated
here upon Earth, of which we unfortunately know of perhaps 10% the life
existing upon this Earth, and seemingly we understand almost nothing
about that 10%. No one even knows the physics truth about ice traveling
through space, much less making it's way onto a planet like Earth.
At the rate we're going, consuming vast resources and thereby each of us
producing 20+ tonnes/year worth of eliminations per greedy soul, of
creating artificial CO2 and absolute loads of other nasty contributions
(managing to shift the albedo of Earth by -5%), it will not be long
before this known 10% worth of life populating Earth will be sucking on
dry energy wells, while the upper most 0.1% argue there's no energy
shortages and no such thing as global warming that's summarily roasting
and/or flooding the rest of us 99.9% have-nots (scum of the Earth) to
death.
The topic here is that our "Space Policy Sucks", and I'll defy you to
prove otherwise.
Regards, Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
The basic topic summary page
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/update-242.htm.htm
-- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
- Next message: Hop David: "Metallic Martian Meteorite?"
- Previous message: Mike Combs: "Re: What makes an ideal Moon base?"
- Next in thread: Brad Guth: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Reply: Brad Guth: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Reply: John Savard: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Reply: Tim K.: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Reply: Brad Guth: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Reply: Brett Zell: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Reply: KMoore: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Reply: Brad Guth: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Reply: Brad Guth: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Reply: Brad Guth: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|