Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus

From: KMoore (Ken.Moore_at_gmail.com)
Date: 01/16/05 

Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 16:11:46 GMT

"Brad Guth" <bradguth@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:6385c4ff160c3d65943ee4ee5c3928ae.49644@mygate.mailgate.org...
> It seems that "sci.space.policy" is primarily established as to
> know-thy-enemy and snooker-thy-humanity, as per avoiding and/or alluding
> to whatever our moon is accessibly good for, and of what's most likely
> artificial about Venus is almost as bad off and every bit lethal as the
> collateral damage and carnage related to all the lies and many other
> perpetrated disinformation factors about Iraq, China, Russia and
> countless other nations on this continuing cold-war of our global energy
> dominating hit-list.
>
> For five years and counting (actually ever since before the Magellan
> mission to Venus), and this is besides all of my observationology and my
> subjective though honest interpretive contributions, there's always been
> more scientific and physics proof-positive of other life making a go of
> it upon Venus than of absolutely everything other than what's situated
> here upon Earth, of which we unfortunately know of perhaps 10% the life
> existing upon this Earth, and seemingly we understand almost nothing
> about that 10%. No one even knows the physics truth about ice traveling
> through space, much less making it's way onto a planet like Earth.
>
> At the rate we're going, consuming vast resources and thereby each of us
> producing 20+ tonnes/year worth of eliminations per greedy soul, of
> creating artificial CO2 and absolute loads of other nasty contributions
> (managing to shift the albedo of Earth by -5%), it will not be long
> before this known 10% worth of life populating Earth will be sucking on
> dry energy wells, while the upper most 0.1% argue there's no energy
> shortages and no such thing as global warming that's summarily roasting
> and/or flooding the rest of us 99.9% have-nots (scum of the Earth) to
> death.
>
> The topic here is that our "Space Policy Sucks", and I'll defy you to
> prove otherwise.
>

The Space Policy doesn't suck.
I do.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Life and Exoplanets (Was: Belief in God is NOT incompatible with science!!)
    ... of vast energy resources greater than Earth (such as Venus). ... sense than having to consider that all life upon Earth is terrestrial ... >They would need to have liquid water on the surface. ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Something i just thought was odd.
    ... The absolute lack of whatever our physics wizards seem to know about ... My notion of utilizing visible photons was for the sake of energy ... The notions of any floating city above mother Earth sucks really bad ... surviving upon Venus, here's what I'd offered to others about what's ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Something i just thought was odd.
    ... The absolute lack of whatever our physics wizards seem to know about ... My notion of utilizing visible photons was for the sake of energy ... The notions of any floating city above mother Earth sucks really bad ... surviving upon Venus, here's what I'd offered to others about what's ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Something i just thought was odd.
    ... > My notion of utilizing visible photons was for the sake of energy ... > profitable win-win for science and humanity, ... > perhaps for practice we should accomplish Earth before it's too late, ... > surviving upon Venus, here's what I'd offered to others about what's ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Lunar Space Elevator simply isnt for everyone
    ... Earth life would already have rad-tolerant DNA/RNA/ life mechanisms, ... The mostly iron core of Earth via friction and geothermal cooling is ... and more often it has been taking more of that energy in order ... Of your mass driver assisting in getting 100t payloads to LL-1, ...
    (sci.space.policy)