Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus
From: Brad Guth (bradguth_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 01/22/05
- Next message: Brad Guth: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Previous message: Joann Evans: "Re: RUSSIA, AMERICA AND CHINA: AN INEVITABLE TRIANGLE OF SPACE"
- In reply to: George William Herbert: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Next in thread: Eric Chomko: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Reply: Eric Chomko: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 02:07:13 +0000 (UTC)
Sorry about that little misunderstanding, though perhaps there's a
Sirius/c planet that's somewhat cloaked like Venus having ice-ages,
though that's not what I meant.
In the future I'll try harder to use fewer words and to use those more
correctly.
Sometimes it helps if you read my somewhat Klingon syntax from the
bottom up, as half the time I'm within my usual dyslexic encryption mode
without realizing it.
Regards, Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm
-- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
- Next message: Brad Guth: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Previous message: Joann Evans: "Re: RUSSIA, AMERICA AND CHINA: AN INEVITABLE TRIANGLE OF SPACE"
- In reply to: George William Herbert: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Next in thread: Eric Chomko: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Reply: Eric Chomko: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]