Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus
From: Brad Guth (bradguth_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 01/23/05
- Next message: Brad Guth: "Re: O2/CH4 Engines on Titan"
- Previous message: Brad Guth: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- In reply to: Eric Chomko: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Next in thread: Damon Hill: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Reply: Damon Hill: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Reply: Eric Chomko: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 05:45:08 +0000 (UTC)
Eric Chomko; "Look I'm no Bush fan, but I fail to see how politics fits
into the discussion."
I shall attempt to improve upon my previous wordings;
I believe that honest physics and science needs lots of funding
(certainly more than it's getting as of today), and a reasonably
peaceful world within which to practice their magic. I also believe that
science and physics individuals, like between government agencies and
NASA engineers simply do not communicate with one another, thus hardly
anyone is connecting the dots on behalf of humanity, at least not unless
there's another grant or an extension of the one there on somehow
involved. Money talks, the truth be damned, and the buyier is always
right.
Our country has self-inflicted great harm upon the entire world, by way
of imposing at least several trillion dollars/euros worth of this 9/11
fiasco, and by way of our systematically dog-wagging, spinning and
hyping the hype, of pushing humanity back decades by delivering so much
disinformation-R-us upon the snookered and dumbfounded public, of only
further expediting upon the course of those thousands lights burning
brightly on an extremely limited supply of oil, that which this oil
flame fest isn't over until our fat lady sings. You do realise that our
resident warlord has been planning upon going nuclear over this global
energy domination fiasco?
You simply can't divert the sorts of talents and resources for another
war upon taking control of global energy resources, as persay blowing
off such dollars/euros and of whatever humanity gets in the way, at
least not without directly impacting the needs of science and physics
research, not to mention the raw everyday needs of what the lower
99.9%(scum of the Earth) needs right here and now.
If we and our few allies have to keep spending another ten billion
dollars/euros every week as focused upon blowing up half the world, then
after the fact attempting to repair the collateral damage, as opposed to
the few dollars/euros that goes into honest physics and science, chances
are that we'll all become either bankrupt or quite dead long before the
fat lady sings.
Thus science and physics sucks really bad, especially if it's having to
continually back the mainstream status quo until them Apollo cows come
home. The actions and/or the equivalent of inactions is more often the
direct result of folks insisting that history is entirely correct, and
that they and their government never once made any mistakes, only made
good things happen.
I can't speak for yourself but, at least I'm still human enough to be
making mistakes, just like the mistake I've been making for the past
five years in attempting to share what's a whole lot more truth worthy
than mainstreamers care to acknowledge.
Regards, Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm
-- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
- Next message: Brad Guth: "Re: O2/CH4 Engines on Titan"
- Previous message: Brad Guth: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- In reply to: Eric Chomko: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Next in thread: Damon Hill: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Reply: Damon Hill: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Reply: Eric Chomko: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
