Re: Bush Administration Kills Hubble Space Telescope

From: Rand Simberg (simberg.interglobal_at_org.trash)
Date: 01/26/05 

Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 15:58:45 GMT

On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 07:47:28 -0500, in a place far, far away, gregg
<saville@comcast.net> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a
way as to indicate that:
 
>>>Rand Simberg wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> I wouldn't waste pixels on him, George.
>>>
>>>Though you do...endlessly.....
>>
>> Actually, I don't. He's been in my killfile for a couple days. Note
>> that my reply was to George's reply to him...
>
>Couple of days???? I don't think so.

<looking at filter>

It's true.

>Whether it's this newsgroup or others you are still responding directly to
>him, and it's getting posted here.

No, I haven't in a while.

>Dunno if you posted your reply here, but
>it comes here and anyways that's irrelevant. As of 10:15 am UTC today you
>are still "wasting pixels" on him...

Only in this one post, my first since I killfiled him, not
"endlessly." That was the point of contention. To say that is as
fraudulent as the title of the movie "The Neverending Story." ;-)

> I read the email below, just a few minutes ago. Note today's date:
>
>
>Re: Bush cancels Hubble telescope rescue mission
>From:
>Rand Simberg <simberg.interglobal@org.trash>
>Date:
>Wednesday 26 January 2005 10:14:55 am
>Groups:
>alt.politics.usa,alt.politics.bush,sci.space.policy
>
>On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 03:47:26 +0000 (UTC), in a place far, far away,
>echomko_at_@polaris.umuc.edu (Eric Chomko) made the phosphor on my
>monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that:

Oh, you're confused. I'm not referring to Eric Chomko. I'm talking
about "casioculture." I'm still replying to Eric, though even that is
not "endlessly." I'm ignoring most of his idiocy, even (particularly,
in fact) when he pathetically attempts to insult me.

"casioculture" (isn't it amusing that these loons think that they have
to be anonymous when they speak truth to power
^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hnonsense to indifference?) is who George was
replying to.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Doberman Questions
    ... you're replying should be "active" in the software. ... killfile in google, resist the temptation to click on one of his ... Top posting versus bottom posting. ...
    (rec.pets.dogs.breeds)
  • Re: Note to fellow newsgroup posters
    ... Thats fine, but you do realise that by replying to Kenny, you've ... to avoid replying to anyone whom you have, for one reason or ... another, chosen to killfile? ... adjust your email clients. ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: Note to fellow newsgroup posters
    ... Do you think it is reasonable, in an open forum, to expect others to avoid replying to anyone whom you have, for one reason or another, chosen to killfile? ... The point that Kenny McCormack, rather annoyingly, tries to make is sometimes valid: some of the participants in this ng take themselves a little too seriously. ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: New Thunderbolts 11 couldnt have happened. --
    ... Just stick him in a killfile ... I also read many of the same books but I sure don't read ... replying to Yeager seems a bit presumptuous on your part. ...
    (rec.arts.comics.marvel.universe)
  • Re: Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama Discuss Space Policy
    ... R. Frank" made the phosphor on my monitor glow ... Wallace Wright made the phosphor on my ... Most of the remaining noise I see comes from people I don't want to killfile making useless replies to people already in my killfile. ...
    (sci.space.policy)