Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus
From: Brad Guth (bradguth_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 01/27/05
- Next message: Eric Chomko: "Re: Bush cancels Hubble telescope rescue mission"
- Previous message: Eric Chomko: "Re: Bush cancels Hubble telescope rescue mission"
- In reply to: Captain?: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Next in thread: Captain!: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Reply: Captain!: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 22:10:32 +0000 (UTC)
Some folks (the likes of Fred J. McCall) are just born losers, born
again into being easily snookered by whatever their perverted mainstream
status quo has to offer.
If instead of our perpetrated cold-war and the likes of essentially
creating 9/11, if those trillions of hard earned dollars/euros had been
honestly invested into decades worth of Earth sciences (which so happens
to include terrestrial satellites and our moon), chances are reasonably
good that we'd all be living a decade longer and within a much higher
standard and/or quality of life, plus our world would not have become
nearly as polluted.
The only modern day reason why the likes of China remains so dependent
upon coal, and of other impoverished nations upon depleting their
old-growth forest is directly because of the AMERICAN and BRITISH oil
cartels that have been encharge of just about everything that's of
natural gas, coal and oil, and only secondly due to our anti-nuclear
sharing mind-set that would otherwise have almost eliminated the
depletion of the major nations using coal and oil more than two decades
ago, and thirdly by way of keeping the world market value of coal, oil
and natural gas to a reasonable minimum, thus surplus and affordable
energy to those without the likes of nuclear technology, and thereby of
nearly no value as to be fighting over.
Instead of our having to deal with all the collateral damage and carnage
of the innocent, just think of all the terrific inventions and/or
improvements that should have transpired, that probably will never
transpire as long as we keep bushing all those other 'do not push'
buttons, along with all of our ulterior motives and hidden agendas so
intent upon controlling/moderating over the remaining energy reserves so
as to most benefit the upper most 0.1% of humanity. No wonder certain
folks are getting pissed. If you were one of those 99.9% (scum of the
Earth) havenots, wouldn't you?.
Regards, Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm
-- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
- Next message: Eric Chomko: "Re: Bush cancels Hubble telescope rescue mission"
- Previous message: Eric Chomko: "Re: Bush cancels Hubble telescope rescue mission"
- In reply to: Captain?: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Next in thread: Captain!: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Reply: Captain!: "Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|