Primordial, The Infinite Within The Infinitesimal

From: glbrad01 (glbrad01_at_insightbb.com)
Date: 02/04/05 

Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 09:44:58 GMT

Stephen Hawking once wrote that there can be nothing below, beyond, or
inside, the Planck horizon but a miniature blackhole. I don't know whether
he has since changed his mind (with the advancement in string theory) but I
think he got it exactly backward.

  By all things that are holy to cosmology and physics, I think that if that
were something like a blackhole inside that horizon then it would have been
the Big Crunch itself and the horizon, and following it the whole of the
Universe, should have collapsed into it. It would be a monster. The mother
of all monsters. It would be the Big Crunch.

  So it is not the Big Crunch. Mass wise, density wise, energy wise, and
heat wise, it should be the exact opposite.

  I've wondered for more than a decade where the heat could be that had to
be in the Universe. Where the scale reached. I mean hot as in "unification"
hot.

  For just about the same length of time I've wondered where the
non-electric repulsion force could be there has to be in the Universe. I'm
an anti-expansion man, having realized, at least to my own satisfaction,
that gravity is at once its own opposer in an (if it is) infinite Universe.
Like state versus, in opposing position, the individual that just happens to
the very constituent element of its existence gravity of all the fundamental
forces has to be its worst enemy, or the opposer in opposing position to
itself. Not as a repulsion or pressure force but as a universal gravity on
one rim outside them all in opposing position, opposing attraction, to each
and every constituent hub or center of gravity in the whole of the Universe.
What would spring from this mutually opposing attraction would be the entity
of "space" and otherwise the appearance, not any reality, of an accelerating
expansion of the Universe.

  But even if this were the scenario, it still would be no answer to the
question of where is the non-electric repulsion or pressure force? In what
way, shape, or form is it in. I finally realized suddenly--thanks to some
things Brian Greene writes in The Fabric Of The Universe that pushed me to
my own visualization of it in my own way--to go small, very small,
infinitely small, micro-universal, in order to go big, very big, infinitely
big, macro-Universal, for the answer to both my questions and just about my
every remaining question, including one more where I kept telling myself
that the primordial (essentially 'Primordial Wild' of the Universe itself)
should be as common and constant to the Universe as anything is in it. Thus
where in heck would it be if it is so damn prevalent?

  Right where it should be, in exactly the same answer as the answer to the
rest of my remaining questions, the infinite in the infinitesimal (The
chicken is from the egg, the egg is from the chicken: The tree is from the
seed, the seed is from the tree: The creation is [in] the creator, the
creator is in the creation: and so on along the same line).

  To really get an idea of what I am talking about, forget the picture of
that relative horizon as being one horizon but look to its identical
twinning to infinity inside an infinity of the
sub-sub-sub-sub-sub...subatomic in an infinite Universe. Only then you might
just begin to get an idea of potency that makes the standard Big Bang vision
pale by comparison. And it is, has ever been, and will ever be, common as
dirt (relatively speaking). The infinite primordial within the infinitesimal
within the least horizon within an infinite Universe. Mirroring also in
opposing distant horizon, the macro-universal, from each of all of the
infinity of the centers of an infinite Universe (because the [relative]
Planck horizons and the [relative] 'ultimate monsters' within, twinned to
infinity as they are, are each and every one of them the true "dead centers"
of the Universe, no matter any plane of it, no matter....., no matter what,
leveraged! (if this be the right word for it).

Brad

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Primordial, The Infinite Within The Infinitesimal
    ... the Planck horizon but a miniature blackhole. ... > Universe, ... > that gravity is at once its own opposer in an infinite Universe. ... > Like state versus, in opposing position, the individual that just happens to ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Primordial, The Infinite Within The Infinitesimal
    ... the Planck horizon but a miniature blackhole. ... > whole of the Universe, ... > rest of my remaining questions, the infinite in the infinitesimal (The ... raised by relativity to a status of full, however mitigated, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Primordial, The Infinite Within The Infinitesimal
    ... the Planck horizon but a miniature blackhole. ... Universe, ... that gravity is at once its own opposer in an infinite Universe. ... Like state versus, in opposing position, the individual that just happens to ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Primordial, The Infinite Within The Infinitesimal
    ... the Planck horizon but a miniature blackhole. ... >> whole of the Universe, ... >> the rest of my remaining questions, the infinite in the infinitesimal ... > subjective relativity as an objective compartmented finite part of the ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Gravity and Inflation
    ... I've theorized about gravity facing, opposing, itself in the Universe, the ... for having this view because it is a view of infinite Universe and points ...
    (sci.physics)
Loading