Re: Does Mars need women? Russians say no
From: Rhonda Lea Kirk (rhondalea_at_gmail.com)
Date: 02/13/05
- Next message: Joshua Halpern: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Previous message: David M. Palmer: "Re: Death Sentence for the Hubble?"
- In reply to: Fred J. McCall: "Re: Does Mars need women? Russians say no"
- Next in thread: Fred J. McCall: "Re: Does Mars need women? Russians say no"
- Reply: Fred J. McCall: "Re: Does Mars need women? Russians say no"
- Reply: Michael Smith: "Re: Does Mars need women? Russians say no"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 17:57:55 -0500
Fred J. McCall wrote:
> Michael Smith wrote:
>> But going to mars actually requires somebody
>> physically small and able to live on smaller
>> quantities of oxygen, food, etc.
>> More women would satisfy this requirement than men,
>> so using Grigoryev's own argument it should be
>> women going to Mars.
> Think 'calcium loss'. I think this affects women
> much more severely than men.
So now we're sending post-menopausal women to Mars?
Seriously, women don't have a higher risk of
osteoporosis until after menopause. Other risk factors
include being Asian or Caucasian, taking certain drugs,
smoking, alcoholism, bone structure and body weight,
lack of weight-bearing exercise and heredity.
rl
- Next message: Joshua Halpern: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Previous message: David M. Palmer: "Re: Death Sentence for the Hubble?"
- In reply to: Fred J. McCall: "Re: Does Mars need women? Russians say no"
- Next in thread: Fred J. McCall: "Re: Does Mars need women? Russians say no"
- Reply: Fred J. McCall: "Re: Does Mars need women? Russians say no"
- Reply: Michael Smith: "Re: Does Mars need women? Russians say no"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]