Re: NASA Researchers Claim Evidence of Present Life on Mars
From: kert (kaido_kert_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 02/18/05
- Next message: Paul F. Dietz: "Re: Death Sentence for the Hubble?"
- Previous message: Rand Simberg: "Re: Death Sentence for the Hubble?"
- In reply to: William Elliot: "NASA Researchers Claim Evidence of Present Life on Mars"
- Next in thread: Jim Oberg: "Re: NASA Researchers Claim Evidence of Present Life on Mars"
- Reply: Jim Oberg: "Re: NASA Researchers Claim Evidence of Present Life on Mars"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 18 Feb 2005 04:39:32 -0800
William Elliot wrote:
> NASA Researchers Claim Evidence of Present Life on Mars
> http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/mars_life_050216.html
> <snip>
> What Stoker and Lemke have found, according to several attendees of
> the private meeting, is not direct proof of life on Mars, but methane
> signatures and other signs of possible biological activity remarkably
> similar to those recently discovered in caves here on Earth.
Uh, isnt there a word in english for that - speculation ? So, what else
is new ?
-kert
- Next message: Paul F. Dietz: "Re: Death Sentence for the Hubble?"
- Previous message: Rand Simberg: "Re: Death Sentence for the Hubble?"
- In reply to: William Elliot: "NASA Researchers Claim Evidence of Present Life on Mars"
- Next in thread: Jim Oberg: "Re: NASA Researchers Claim Evidence of Present Life on Mars"
- Reply: Jim Oberg: "Re: NASA Researchers Claim Evidence of Present Life on Mars"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
