Re: Death Sentence for the Hubble?
From: Eric Chomko (echomko_at__at_polaris.umuc.edu)
Date: 02/18/05
- Next message: Eric Chomko: "Re: Death Sentence for the Hubble?"
- Previous message: Rand Simberg: "Re: ESA make NASA look user friendly"
- In reply to: kert: "Re: Death Sentence for the Hubble?"
- Next in thread: Eric Chomko: "Re: Death Sentence for the Hubble?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 17:34:31 +0000 (UTC)
kert (kaido_kert@hotmail.com) wrote:
: Charles Buckley wrote:
: > 2005: 3 flights
: > 2006: 6 flights
: > 2007: 6 flights
: > 2008: 6 flights
: > 2009: 6 flights
: >
: > 27 flights. And, even those won't do everything, IIRC.
: >
: > And, looking at the manifest, they are thinking only 5 a
: > year.. which effectively means *zero* room for slippage.
: Which effectively means that the effort is screwed from the get-go. Ask
: any project manager that has led a project longer than couple of weeks.
: *zero* error margin projects never have a snowballs chance in hell.
And when ISS is done what do we have? Right now it looks like the best
thing to do aside of the "humans in space" guinea pig medical analysis, is
the telerobotics testbed for exactly what Hubble needs!
The irony!
Eric
: -kert
- Next message: Eric Chomko: "Re: Death Sentence for the Hubble?"
- Previous message: Rand Simberg: "Re: ESA make NASA look user friendly"
- In reply to: kert: "Re: Death Sentence for the Hubble?"
- Next in thread: Eric Chomko: "Re: Death Sentence for the Hubble?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
